Criterion Five
Self Study
Review Resources
Criterion 5a
Community
Outreach
Advice
Criterion 5b
Service
Learning
Off Campus
Resources
Diversity
Adult Education
Criterion 5c
Sciences
Arts
Engagement
Urban Mission
Criterion 5d
Opportunities
Documentation
Committee
Evidence to collect
|
 |
|
Criterion Five: Engagement and Service
As called for by its mission, the organization identifies its constituencies and serves them in ways both value.
|
|
 |
 |
Review of Resources Used in the Assessment
As a first step in assessing engagement and service, the Criterion 5 committee reviewed
UMKC’s mission documents, as well as the mission statements of each of our academic units,
centers and institutes. In addition, the strategic plans of academic units and their alignment
with the university’s mission, especially as these related to Criterion 5’s core components,
were examined. This process provided an overview of both of our campuses, Volker and
Hospital Hill, and the interrelatedness of its programs and services.
(A more in-depth
discussion of UMKC’s planning processes is in Criterion 2.)
|
 |
Following an examination of the missions and strategic plans, the committee reviewed a
series of reports and surveys. Included in the review were two reports: Time to Get It Right:
A Strategy for Higher Education in Kansas City and One Year Later: Time to Get Things
Done. These reports were published by the Greater Kansas City Community Foundation
[GKCCF] and addressed not only the core mission areas for UMKC, but also provided an
in-depth discussion on the current state of higher education in the metropolitan area. The
reports analyzed the role that locally based organizations, including life science research
institutes, arts organizations and higher education play in shaping our community. Both
GKCCF reports emphasized a call for greater collaboration in and among the area’s health
and life sciences organizations and a need for higher education institutions, particularly
our University, to engage more broadly with the community in addressing urban issues and
helping to develop the future workforce of Kansas City.
As a result of these reports, several response papers were written by the UMKC Board of
Trustees around specific areas cited within the reports. (Full descriptions of UMKC’s Board
of Trustees and the University of Missouri System’s Board of Curators appear in our self
study’s Introduction.) In addition, three commissions were created by UMKC’s Division
of Academic Affairs to address three of our mission areas: health and life sciences; visual
and performing arts; and urban issues and education. The Criterion 5 committee reviewed
the work conducted by the three mission-based commissions, as well as specific reports
from UMKC’s School of Law and the Henry W. Bloch School of Business and Public
Administration. We also studied other reports, including the Kansas City Civic Council’s
executive summary of its Higher Education Task Force and the Blue Ribbon Planning
Initiatives Reports.
(Criterion 2 provides an in-depth discussion of these reports.)
Surveys were also reviewed as part of our committee’s assessment process. These included
the National Survey of Student Engagement 2007 (also), the Law School Survey of Student
Engagement 2006, the UMKC Workplace of Choice Survey 2004, and the UMKC Senior
Survey 2005/06 and 2007/08. In order to identify common patterns and locate areas for improvement, data
from these surveys was tied back to UMKC’s mission documents and strategic plans for each
of the academic units.
Challenges Identified through this process
UMKC has experienced significant administrative instability over the past eight years:
six Chancellors and seven Provosts. A number of changes have also occurred at the Vice-
Chancellor level with many of our administrators leaving during the past three years.
Changes in Deans in several academic units have also occurred. These ongoing changes in
leadership have challenged our ability to maintain consistency in some of our programs and
delivery of services to constituents.
|
Yet despite these changes, growth has occurred. For example, the Volker campus greatly
expanded residential housing and the Hospital Hill campus became home to a new state-ofthe-
art health sciences building. Two important community-focused programs were launched:
the Institute for Urban Education, a unique collaboration between UMKC’s School of
Education and local school districts, and the Institute for Entrepreneurship and Innovation
within UMKC’s Henry W. Bloch School of Business and Public Administration. Additional
projects centered on urban planning, global warming and creativity have continued to
develop, expanding the reach of UMKC well beyond the borders of the campus. These and
other programs will be more fully discussed later in this chapter.
|
 |
|